Why Relying On High Risk Pools To Cover Sickest 20% Of Us Won't Work - Candidates Should Take Notice

The New York Times
has an article today
about the anemic approaches to covering the sickest Americans, those with chronic medical conditions who are often 'uninsurable' outside of group plans (generally corporate employers) - It shows why relying on high risk pools wont work.. (they are too expensive and such huge money-losers for the ststes that most don't have them, they also dramatically raise rates for the healthy in states that require that 'nobody be turned away'.) Also, the high risk pools are often limited in size (some have waiting lists that stretch on for years or even decades) or by income, leaving uninsured poor and middle class people who make more than two to four times the poverty level with nowhere to turn until they have 'spent down' all their assets, sold homes and cars, etc. to pay medical bills.

Medical bills are the largest cause of bankruptcies.

"The heart attack left Mr. Benamor with a $17,000 hospital bill, $400 in monthly prescription costs and a desperate need for insurance.  After being rejected by a number of commercial carriers, he turned to the Maryland Health Insurance Plan, one of 35 state programs for high-risk applicants whom no private company is willing to insure."

These programs are very expensive, so only the very richest of the very sick can afford them.

"He decided that the annual premium -- $4,572 for a plan with heavy deductibles -- was more than he could handle on an income of about $35,000.  Yet his earnings were too high for him to qualify for state subsidies.

"I'd like to get it, but what do you pay first?"  Mr. Benamor asked at his dining room table.  "Do you pay the mortgage?  Do you pay your child support?  Do you pay your car insurance?  Do you pay for your medicine?""

Good question. I think I would pay rent first (if you don't have a home, your life is in danger) then food, then medicine, then child support.. There easily might not be any money left over for insurance.

"
In late April, Mr. McCain, Republican of Arizona, announced that if elected president he would seek to insure people like Mr. Benamor by vastly expanding federal support for state high-risk pools like Maryland's, or by creating a structure modeled after them.  But as Mr. Benamor's case demonstrates, even well-regarded pools have served more as a stopgap than a solution."

"Though high-risk pools have existed for three decades, they cover only 207,000 people in a country with 47 million uninsured, according to the National Association of State Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans.  Premiums typically are high, as much as twice the standard rate in some states, but are still not nearly enough to pay claims.  That has left states to cover about 40 percent of the cost, usually through assessments on insurance premiums that are often passed on to consumers."

"Health economists say it could take untold billions to transform the patchwork of programs into a viable federal safety net.  The McCain campaign has made only a rough calculation of how many billions would be needed and has not identified a source for the fi-nancing beyond savings from existing programs.  Finding the money will only get more difficult now that Mr. McCain has pledged to balance the federal budget by 2013, which already requires a significant reduction in the growth of spending."

So, my guess is that given the cost, which equals at least 5% of Pentagon spending, McCain will postpone even starting to look at the problem till 2012 as Obama has done. Otherwise, he might need to reduce our spending on our thousands of overseas military bases and the black budget.

"Mr. McCain's proposal stands in sharp relief to that of his Democratic rival, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, who wants to require insurers to accept all applicants, regardless of their health.  That is now the law in five states, including New York and New Jersey."

And in those states, insurance is very expensive. To many, its unaffordable.

"For those who can afford the premiums, or who qualify for subsidies in the 13 states that provide them, the high-risk programs can be a godsend."

"Richard and Susan Logan, both of whom have battled cancer this decade, said they were grateful to have coverage for themselves and their daughter through the Maryland plan, even though it will cost $22,232 this year."
(This is Obama's solution for those not in group plans, i.e. "nobody can be turned away" For thse who can afford the money, its great, because otherwise, their costs would be still higher. But it will increase the costs for the healthy dramatically. No wonder he doesn't want to attack this problem till his second term.)  

"They had been rejected by 25 commercial insurers, said Mrs.  Logan, 57, a part-time billing clerk for a physician."

"A fifth of the 14,000 participants in the Maryland plan receive subsidies that drop their premiums below the market rates charged to healthy people, said Richard A.  Popper, the plan's director.  But many in the middle find the policies both unaffordable and intolerably restrictive, and Mr. Popper estimates that two-thirds of those eligible have not enrolled."

"Almost all of the state pools impose waiting periods of up to a year before covering the health conditions that initially made it impossible to obtain insurance.  In some states, fiscal pressures have forced heavy restrictions in coverage and enrollment.  Florida, which has 3.8 million uninsured people, closed its pool to new applicants in 1991, and the membership has dwindled to 313."


Ouch...

"There is no census of the medically uninsurable.  But in 2006, insurers turned down 11 percent of all individual applicants for medical reasons, including 22 percent of those 50 or older, according to America's Health Insurance Plans, an industry trade group."

"Finding a way to cover the sickest of the uninsured is critically important because 15 percent of the population is responsible for three-fourths of health care spending.  Many wind up in emergency rooms, which cannot legally reject them, leaving hospitals with more than $30 billion in unpaid bills each year."

"With the goal of making the insurance marketplace more equitable and competitive, Mr. McCain would end the longstanding exclusion from income taxes of health benefits paid by employers.  The 17 million nonelderly people covered by directly purchased insurance do not enjoy that advantage."

"Currently, those who buy insurance individually often face higher costs because their risks are not spread across broad groups of workers.  Though insurers cannot discriminate against participants in group plans, they evaluate consumers seeking individual coverage case by case to determine if they are worth the risk of coverage, and at what price. Insurers contend that if they had to charge the same rates to all comers, many would wait until they were sick to buy policies."

That is Obama's poison pill..  Most healthy Americans wont vote to make their insurance two or three or even four times more expensive.. so the proposal will die.

"Critics argue that, to date, insurers have benefited from the state pools as much as the uninsured.  As long as premiums remain above market rates, the pools insulate commercial insurers from the greatest risks while giving customers little incentive to abandon their private policies."

"They are run in ways that protect the profitability of commercial insurers," said Karen Pollitz, a professor at Georgetown University who has studied high-risk pools and who has served on the board of the Maryland plan.  "They leave the illusion that there's a safety net without there really being much of one."

Mr. Obama's plan differs from Mr. McCain's in several ways.  In addition to requiring insurers to accept all applicants, he would require that parents obtain insurance for their children.  To make premiums affordable, he would create a Medicare-like government plan that would be open to all and pump up to $65 billion a year into subsidies.  The money would come from repealing President Bush's income tax cuts for those earning more than $250,000 a year.

When Mr. McCain unveiled his high-risk pool proposal, his chief domestic policy adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, the former director of the Congressional Budget Office, estimated the federal cost at $7 billion to $10 billion.  Mr. Holtz-Eakin said five million to seven million uninsured people would be singled out for coverage.

Mr. Holtz-Eakin and other McCain health advisers, including Thomas P.  Miller, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and Stephen T.  Parente, a health economist at the University of Minnesota, said premiums would probably be capped at twice the standard rates.  They said subsidies might be available to those making up to four times the federal poverty level, or $41,600 for a single person.

Financial incentives would probably be provided to those who effectively manage their diseases.  No decision has been made about waiting periods for pre-existing conditions, the advisers said.

Mr. McCain's proposal would represent a huge increase over the $50 million a year that Congress now appropriates in grants to the state pools, in a program that began in 2002.  But several analysts questioned whether even $10 billion would be nearly enough, given that the states now spend about $2 billion to insure 207,000 people.

"I do not for a minute think it will cost 7 to 10 billion dollars a year," Ms. Pollitz said.  "It may cost 7 to 10 billion dollars a week."

In an admonition for Mr. McCain, Maryland's five-year-old plan, like others before it, has quickly become a victim of its growth.  As enrollment expanded by 30 percent in each of the last two years, actuaries forecast insolvency as soon as 2010 and compelled the plan's board to apply the brakes.

Over the last two years, it has raised premiums, deductibles and co-payments, increased out-of-pocket maximums, lowered the lifetime cap on payments and added a waiting period for pre-existing conditions, which rose to six months from two months on July 1.  It also increased the amount applicants must pay to buy their way out of the waiting period.

At the same time, the plan is making more people eligible for subsidies.  To keep it afloat, the state is raising the assessment on hospital bills that provides two-thirds of its financing.

"It's not easy when you see there is strong demand for something and you need to temper that demand," Mr. Popper, the plan's director, said.  "But you either find a way to slow enrollment through economic forces or you close the plan and no one gets in, which is a solution that no one wants."


Poll
Is it time to move to Canada?
Yes
No

Votes: 5
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


I guess we are all screwed then (none / 0)

Both of the candidates who have a chance to be President aren't going to fix this problem and no one else can.  What are we to do?  


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:50:04 AM EST

Re: Why Relying On High Risk Pools To Cover Sickes (2.00 / 1)

Health care is no longer an issue. That was never Obama's or McCain's issue. The healthcare horse is dead, the people decided that it was not important to them. This election is about Iraq and only Iraq. Nothing else matters.


"Do you know the difference between a War Story and a Fairy Tale?"
by RedstateLib on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 10:51:55 AM EST

Wha? (none / 0)

Are you serious???


by catfish2 on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 11:26:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wha? (2.00 / 1)

That my friend is the sad truth. You and I don't have to like it. How many times have you heard the "she voted for the war" reason not to vote for her. What will be real sad is health care, the economy are getting kicked to the curb to elect a guy on one issue that even his closest advisors admit his plan is not realistic and will need to be re evaluated next year after the election.


"Do you know the difference between a War Story and a Fairy Tale?"
by RedstateLib on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 12:22:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama was my first choice UNTIL (none / 0)

he was so stubborn about not mandating the young and the healthy buy health insurance.


by catfish2 on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 11:27:44 AM EST

Re: Not going to matter (none / 0)

At the end of the day, once Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, Max Baucus, Charlie Rangel, and congressional committees having jurisdiction over health care reform get their hands on the bill, then we'll know what will happen.

Also, Obama's health care plan is far more ambitious than Bill Clinton's was in 1996 and Al Gore's was in 2000.  Obama's plan is even more ambitious than Kerry's was in 2004.  As an actuary, I agree with you on mandates, but don't let perfection be the enemy of the good.


by Brad G on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 12:42:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama's top priority (2.00 / 1)

is making it possible for large businesses to continue to insure their most valuable employees while they remain employed.

If they become too ill to work, then they lose their jobs and healthcare and clearly, don't matter that much in the corporate scheme of things anymore.

This seems to be the consequence of letting corporate interests buy America.

McCain, as I am sure most of you are itching to point out, is "even worse".


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Without a REAL committment to it, we WON'T win in November.
by architek on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 02:27:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I work for the Government (none / 0)

Who gets group insurance that covers everyone.  My insurance is pretty high I guess, about $800 per month for both my son and I, but they cannot drop people from the plan, nor fail to insure them as long as they are an employee or family member of an employee.  Living in California probably makes my rates higher than they would be in some other states, but medical insurance is still probably too damned high.


accepting McLettuce is like being 9 years old and forced to eat your own cooking
by Sychotic1 on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 11:33:05 AM EST

That is your contribution, right? (none / 0)

How much does your employer pay? Usually, the burdened rate for a full time position is much higher than just the salary.. it can be as much as twice as high.. Thats the cost of the person's salary plus benefits plus disability insurance, etc., cost of the person's office and other incidental expenses involved with having another employee. These days, I understand healthcare is rising very rapidly..

Health insurance is probably the single largest expense associated with having employees these days apart from their salary. No wonder businesses are shedding employees and are very reluctant to hire those over 35 anymore.

From what I understand, the total cost of health insurance that the government pays for the average employee is much, much higher than that.

The employee contribution is just a portion of the cost. Its in their interest to have healthy employees so they pay quite a bit of it. Also, they spread the risk among a large number of people. If a family, or a very small company, say a group of three or four, goes shopping for insurance, and one member is sick.. then the cost can be very high..

Insurance is priced by risk. Its inherent to the private insurance model. As long as it is priced by risk, then they will charge sick people more.


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Without a REAL committment to it, we WON'T win in November.
by architek on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 02:37:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That is your contribution, right? (none / 0)

That includes my employer's contribution.  As a Budget Manager I am very aware of the total cost.


accepting McLettuce is like being 9 years old and forced to eat your own cooking
by Sychotic1 on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 06:31:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Exactly (2.00 / 1)

As the Finance Committee noted in a Monday, 16 June 2008 hearing, 20% of the population accounts for 80% of the health care costs.  This is the central fact to any health care policy.  If you allow insurers to accept or reject applicants on an individual basis as Bush and McCain have proposed, insurers will refuse to cover the 20% who account for 80% of the costs.  If you require insurers to accept all applicants but don't require everyone to purchase health insurance, a large percentage of the healthiest 80% of the population will choose not to purchase insurance, the sickest 20% will comprise of a larger percentage of the insureds, and premiums will rise.    


by Brad G on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 12:39:13 PM EST

Re: Exactly (2.00 / 1)

That sums it up very well.

Its also the case that mandates will be one of the most politically controversial part of a health care reform.  By itself, outside of a larger sweeping reform, mandates will thus be essentially impossible to pass.  Therefore, the suggestion (made at times by Obama) that you could do health care reform without mandates and maybe put in mandates later through other legislation, is not realistic.

Its pretty much now or never.  Let's hope Obama sees the light, for the good of millions of Americans.


John McCain: Extending SCHIP would be an "unfunded liability."
by Fuzzy Dunlop on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 12:47:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why Relying On High Risk Pools To Cover Sickes (none / 0)

apparently we're screwed. moving to France is more appealing than ever to me.

[why does it seem like UHC is something so out of reach, so impossible to achieve-]


"Rankles and Rush Limbaugh, ruining the chaos brand since 2008."
by alyssa chaos on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 12:45:47 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.